<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IT dashboard halts 45 wasteful Veteran&#8217;s Affairs projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nolastat.org/blog/2009/07/17/best_practices/it-dashboard-halts-45-wasteful-veterans-affairs-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nolastat.org/blog/2009/07/17/best_practices/it-dashboard-halts-45-wasteful-veterans-affairs-projects/</link>
	<description>A new operating system for New Orleans &#124; transparency ~ accountability ~ civic participation</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Improving return on investment in government IT procurement &#124; NolaStat 2010</title>
		<link>http://nolastat.org/blog/2009/07/17/best_practices/it-dashboard-halts-45-wasteful-veterans-affairs-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator>Improving return on investment in government IT procurement &#124; NolaStat 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nolastat.org/blog/?p=220#comment-3325</guid>
		<description>[...] Given the size and importance of IT investments at the federal level, the potential savings from improving project oversight is enormous. One example is that Kundra sent a memo to the Environmental Protection Agency’s CIO explaining what he expects to see done to get a project on course again that is now $30 million over its budget and a year behind schedule. If improvements aren&#8217;t seen, Kundra could halt projects, as was done earlier last year with a Veterans&#8217; Administration IT project. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Given the size and importance of IT investments at the federal level, the potential savings from improving project oversight is enormous. One example is that Kundra sent a memo to the Environmental Protection Agency’s CIO explaining what he expects to see done to get a project on course again that is now $30 million over its budget and a year behind schedule. If improvements aren&#8217;t seen, Kundra could halt projects, as was done earlier last year with a Veterans&#8217; Administration IT project. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
